Admissions Are Open for the Academic Year 2026-27

SSR

SSR

Extended Profile

Metric No. Parameter Link
1.1Number of students year wise during the last five yearsVIEW
2.1&2.2Number of full time teachers during the last five years (Without repeat count)VIEW
3.1Expenditure excluding salary component year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs)VIEW

CRITERION 1–Curricular Aspects (100)

Key Indicator – 1.1 Curricular Planning and Implementation (20)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
1.1.1 QlM The Institution ensures effective curriculum planning and delivery through a well-planned and documented process including Academic calendar and conduct of continuous internal Assessment Write description in a maximum of 500 words File Description:
  • Upload Additional information
  • Provide Link for Additional information
20 VIEW

Key Indicator– 1.2 Academic Flexibility (30)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
1.2.1 QnM Number of Add on /Certificate/Value added programs offered during the last five years
1.2.1.1: Number of Add on /Certificate /Value added programs offered during the last five years
15 VIEW
1.2.2 QnM Percentage of students enrolled in Certificate/ Add-on/Value added programs as against the total number of students during the last five years
1.2.2.1. Number of students enrolled in subject related Certificate/Add-on/Value added programs year wise during last five years.
15 VIEW

Key Indicator – 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment (30)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
1.3.1 QlM Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability into the Curriculum Write description in a maximum of 500 words10 VIEW
1.3.2 QnM Percentage of students undertaking projects work / field work / internships (Data for the latest completed academic year)
1.3.2.1. Number of students undertaking Project work/ field work/ internships
20 VIEW

Key Indicator– 1.4 Feedback System (20)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
1.4.1 QnM Institution obtains feedback on the academic performance and ambience of the institution from various stakeholders, such as Students, Teachers, Employers, Alumni etc. and action taken report on the feedback is made available on institutional website (Yes or No) 20 VIEW

Criterion 2 – Teaching- Learning and Evaluation (350)

Key Indicator – 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
2.1.1 QnM Enrolment percentage 20 VIEW
2.1.2 QnM Percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC etc.) as per applicable reservation policy for the first year admission during the last five years
2.1.2.1. Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories year wise during last five years (Exclusive of supernumerary seats)
20 VIEW

Key Indicator – 2.2 Student Teacher Ratio (40)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
2.2.1 QnM Student – Full time Teacher Ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) 40 VIEW

Key Indicator – 2.3 Teaching- Learning Process (40)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
2.3.1 QlM Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences and teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning process Write description in a maximum of 500 words 40 VIEW

Key Indicator – 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (40)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
2.4.1 QnM Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years
2.4.1.1 Number of sanctioned posts year wise during the last five years
15 VIEW
2.4.2 QnM Percentage of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/ Ph. D./D.Sc. / D.Litt./L.L.D. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count)
2.4.2.1. Number of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/Ph. D./ D.Sc. / D.Litt./L.L.D year wise during the last five years
25 VIEW

Key Indicator – 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms (40)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
2.5.1 QlM Mechanism of internal/ external assessment is transparent and the grievance redressal system is time- bound and efficient Write description in a maximum of 500 words 40 VIEW

Key Indicator – 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome (90)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
2.6.1 QlM Programme Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs) for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website. Write description in a maximum of 500 words 25 VIEW
2.6.2 QlM Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated. Explain with evidence in a maximum of 500 words 20 VIEW
2.6.3 QnM Pass percentage of Students during last five years. (Excluding Backlog Students) 45 VIEW

Key Indicator – 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (60)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
2.7.1 QnM Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process. 60 VIEW

Criterion 3 – Research, Innovations and Extension (110)

Key Indicator – 3.1 Resource Mobilization for Research (10)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
3.1.1 QnM Grants received from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five years (INR in Lakhs)
3.1.1.1: Total Grants from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five years (INR in Lakhs)
10 VIEW

Key Indicator – 3.2 Innovation Ecosystem (15)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
3.2.1 QlM Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations, Indian Knowledge System (IKS),including awareness about IPR, establishment of IPR cell, Incubation centre and other initiatives for the creation and transfer of knowledge/technology and the outcomes of the same are evident .Write description in a maximum of 500 words 10 VIEW
3.2.2 QnM Number of workshops/seminars/conferences including programs conducted on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship during the last five years
3.2.2.1: Total number of workshops/seminars/conferences including programs conducted on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship year wise during last five years
5 VIEW

Key Indicator – 3.3 Research Publication and Awards (25)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
3.3.1 QnM Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals notified on UGC care list during the last five years
3.3.1.1. Number of research papers in the Journals notified on UGC CARE year wise during the last five years
10 VIEW
3.3.2 QnM Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and papers published in national/ international conference proceedings per teacher during last five years
3.3.2.1. Total number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and papers in national/ international conference proceedings year wise during last five years
15 VIEW

Key Indicator – 3.4 Extension Activities (40)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
3.4.1 QlM Outcomes of Extension activities in the neighborhood community in terms of impact and sensitizing the students to social issues for their holistic development during the last five years. Write description in a maximum of 500 words 10 VIEW
3.4.2 QlM Awards and recognitions received for extension activities from government / government recognized bodies Write description in a maximum of 500 words 10 VIEW
3.4.3 QnM Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through organized forums including NSS/NCC with involvement of community during the last five years
3.4.3.1. Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through organized forums including NSS/NCC with involvement of community during the last five years.
20 VIEW

Key Indicator – 3.5 Collaboration (20)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
3.5.1 QnM Number of functional MoUs/linkages with institutions/ industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the last five years
3.5.1.1 Number of functional MoUs / linkages with institutions/ industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research
20 VIEW

Criterion 4 – Infrastructure and Learning Resources (100)

Key Indicator – 4.1 Physical Facilities (30)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
4.1.1 QlM The Institution has adequate infrastructure and other facilities for a. teaching – learning, viz., classrooms, laboratories, computing equipment etc b. ICT – enabled facilities such as smart class, LMS etc. Facilities for Cultural and sports activities, yoga centre, games (indoor and outdoor), Gymnasium, auditorium etc Describe the adequacy of facilities in maximum of 500 words. 20 VIEW
4.1.2 QnM Percentage of expenditure, excluding salary for infrastructure augmentation during last five years (INR in Lakhs)
4.1.2.1 Expenditure for infrastructure augmentation, excluding salary year wise during last five years (INR in lakhs)
10 VIEW

Key Indicator – 4.2 Library as a learning Resource (20)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
4.2.1 QlM Library is automated with digital facilities using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS), adequate subscriptions to e-resources and journals are made. The library is optimally used by the faculty and students Write description in a maximum of 500 words 20 VIEW

Key Indicator – 4.3 IT Infrastructure (30)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
4.3.1 QlM Institution frequently updates its IT facilities and provides sufficient bandwidth for internet connection Describe IT facilities including Wi-Fi with date and nature of updation, available internet bandwidth within a maximum of 500 words 20 VIEW
4.3.2 QnM Student–Computer ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)
4.3.2.1. Number of computers available for students usage during the latest completed academic year
10 VIEW

Key Indicator – 4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure (20)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
4.4.1 QnM Percentage expenditure incurred on maintenance of physical facilities and academic support facilities excluding salary component, during the last five years
4.4.1.1 Expenditure incurred on maintenance of physical facilities and academic support facilities excluding salary component year wise during last five years (INR in lakhs)
20 VIEW

Criterion 5 – Student Support and Progression (140)

Key Indicator – 5.1 Student Support (50)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
5.1.1 QnM Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the Government and Non-Government agencies during last five years
5.1.1.1. Number of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the Government and Non-Government agencies year wise during last five years
20 VIEW
5.1.2 QnM Capacity building and skills enhancement initiatives taken by the institution include the following 1. Soft skills 2. Language and communication skills 3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene) 4. Awareness of trends in technology 10 VIEW
5.1.3 QnM Percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counselling offered by the Institution during the last five years 5.1.3.1. Number of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counselling offered by the institution year wise during last five years 10 VIEW
5.1.4 QnM The Institution has a transparent mechanism for timely redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases 1. Implementation of guidelines of statutory/regulatory bodies 2. Organization wide awareness and undertakings on policies with zero tolerance 3. Mechanisms for submission of online/offline students’ grievances 4. Timely redressal of the grievances through appropriate committees 10 VIEW

Key Indicator – 5.2 Student Progression (30)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
5.2.1 QnM Percentage of placement of outgoing students and students progressing to higher education during the last five years 5.2.1.1. Number of outgoing students placed and progressed to higher education during the last five years 20 VIEW
5.2.2 QnM Percentage of students qualifying in state/national/ international level examinations during the last five years (eg: JAM/CLAT/GATE/ GMAT/ CAT/ GRE/ TOEFL/ Civil Services/State government examinations) 5.2.2.1. Number of students qualifying in state/ national/ international level examinations (eg: JAM/CLAT/NET/ SLET/ GATE/ GMAT/CAT/GRE/ TOEFL/ Civil Services/ State government examinations) year wise during last five years 10 VIEW

Key Indicator – 5.3 Student Participation and Activities (50)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
5.3.1 QnM Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/ cultural activities at University / state/ national / international level during the last five years
5.3.1.1: Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/cultural activities at University/state/national/international level year wise during the last five years
5.3.1.1: Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/cultural activities at University/state/ national / international level (award for a team event should be counted as one) year wise during the last five years
25 VIEW
5.3.2 QnM Average number of sports and cultural programs in which students of the Institution participated during last five years (organized by the institution/other institutions) 5.3.2.1. Number of sports and cultural programs in which students of the Institution participated year wise during last five years 25VIEW

Key Indicator – 5.4 Alumni Engagement (10)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
5.4.1 QlM There is a registered Alumni Association that contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and/or other support services. Write description in a maximum of 500 words 10 VIEW

Criterion 6 – Governance, Leadership and Management (100)

Key Indicator – 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership (10)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
6.1.1 QIM The institutional governance and leadership are in accordance with the vision and mission of the Institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as NEP implementation, sustained institutional growth, decentralization, participation in the institutional governance and in their short term and long term Institutional Perspective Plan. 10 VIEW

Key Indicator – 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment (10)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
6.2.1 QIM The institutional perspective plan is effectively deployed and functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment, service rules, and procedures, etc. Write description in a maximum of 500 words 6 VIEW
6.2.2 QnM Institution implements e-governance in its operations 1. Administration including complaint management 2. Finance and Accounts 3. Student Admission and Support 4. Examinations 4 VIEW

Key Indicator – 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies (35)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
6.3.1 QIM The institution has performance appraisal system, effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for career development/progression Write description in a maximum of 500 words 8 VIEW
6.3.2 QnM Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years 6.3.2.1. Number of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies year wise during the last five years 12 VIEW
6.3.3 QnM Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), professional development /administrative training programs during the last five years 6.3.3.1. Total number of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), Management Development Programmes (MDPs) professional development /administrative training programs during the last five years6.3.3.2 Number of non-teaching staff year wise during the last five years 15 VIEW

Key Indicator – 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization (15)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
6.4.1 QIM Institution has strategies for mobilization and optimal utilization of resources and funds from various sources (government/ nongovernment organizations) and it conducts financial audits regularly (internal and external) Write description in a maximum of 500 words 15 VIEW

Key Indicator – 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (30)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
6.5.1 QIM Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes. It reviews teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals and records the incremental improvement in various activities Write description in a maximum of 500 words 15 VIEW
6.5.2 QnM Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include: 1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); quality improvement initiatives identified and implemented 2. Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA) and follow-up action taken 3. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s) 4. Participation in NIRF and other recognized rankings 5. Any other quality audit/accreditation recognized by state, national or international agencies such as NAAC, NBA etc. 15 VIEW

Criterion 7 – Institutional Values and Best Practices (100)

Key Indicator – 7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities (50)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
7.1.1 QIM Institution has initiated the Gender Audit and measures for the promotion of gender equity during the last five years. Describe the gender equity & sensitization in curricular and co-curricular activities, facilities for women on campus etc. (Within 500 words) 10 VIEW
7.1.2 QnM The Institution has facilities and initiatives for 1. Alternate sources of energy and energy conservation Measures 2. Management of the various types of degradable and non-degradable waste 3. Water conservation 4. Green campus initiatives 5. Disabled-friendly, barrier free environment 20 VIEW
7.1.3 QnM Quality audits on environment and energy regularly undertaken by the Institution. The institutional environment and energy initiatives are confirmed through the following 1. Green audit / Environment audit 2. Energy audit 3. Clean and green campus initiatives 4. Beyond the campus environmental promotion activities 10 VIEW
7.1.4 QIM Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal socioeconomic and Sensitization of students and employees to the constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens (Within 500 words) Write description in a maximum of 500 words 10 VIEW

Key Indicator – 7.2 Best Practices (30)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
7.2.1 QIM Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual 30 VIEW

Key Indicator – 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness (20)

Metric No. Parameter Weightage Link
7.3.1 QIM Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust within 1000 words 20 VIEW

SSR

DVV Clarification

Extended Profile

Metric No. Parameter Link
1.1 Number of students year wise during the last five years VIEW
2.1 Number of teaching staff/ full time teachers during the last five years (Without repeat count) VIEW
2.2 Number of teaching staff / full time teachers year wise during the last five years VIEW
3.1 Expenditure excluding salary component year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs) VIEW

Criteria 1 : Curricular Aspects

Metric No. Parameter Link
1.2.1 Number of Certificate / Value added courses offered and online courses of MOOCs, SWAYAM, NPTEL etc. (where the students of the institution have enrolled and successfully completed during the last five years) VIEW
1.2.2 Percentage of students enrolled in Certificate / Value added courses and also completed online courses of MOOCs, SWAYAM, NPTEL etc. as against the total number of students during the last five years VIEW
1.3.2 Percentage of students undertaking project work / field work / internships (Data for the latest completed academic year) VIEW
1.4.1 Institution obtains feedback on the academic performance and ambience of the institution from various stakeholders, such as Students, Teachers, Employers, Alumni etc. and action taken report on the feedback is made available on institutional website VIEW

Criteria 2 : Teaching – Learning and Evaluation

Metric No. Parameter Link
2.1.1 Enrolment percentage 2.1.1.1. Number of seats filled year wise during last five years (Only first year admissions to be considered) 2.1.1.2. Number of sanctioned seats year wise during last five years VIEW
2.1.2 Percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC etc.) as per applicable reservation policy for the first year admission during the last five years 2.1.2.1. Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories year wise during last five years (Exclusive of supernumerary seats) 2.1.2.2. Number of seats earmarked for reserved category as per GOI/ State Govt rule year wise during the last five years VIEW
2.2.1 Student – Full time Teacher Ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) VIEW
2.4.1 Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years VIEW
2.4.2 Percentage of full time teachers with NET / SET / SLET / Ph. D./ D.Sc. / D.Litt. / L.L.D. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count) VIEW
2.6.3 Pass percentage of Students during last five years (excluding backlog students) 2.6.3.1. Number of final year students who passed the university examination year wise during the last five years 2.6.3.2. Number of final year students who appeared for the university examination year-wise during the last five years VIEW

Criteria 3 : Research, Innovations and Extension

Metric No. Parameter Link
3.1.1 Grants received from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) 3.1.1.1. Total Grants from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) VIEW
3.2.2 Number of workshops / seminars / conferences including on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship conducted during the last five years 3.2.2.1. Total number of workshops/seminars/conferences including programs conducted on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship year wise during last five years VIEW
3.3.1 Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals notified on UGC care list during the last five years 3.3.1.1. Number of research papers in the Journals notified on UGC CARE list year wise during the last five years VIEW
3.3.2 Number of books and chapters in edited volumes / books published and papers published in national/ international conference proceedings per teacher during last five years 3.3.2.1. Total number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and papers in national/ international conference proceedings year wise during last five years VIEW
3.4.3 Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through organized forums including NSS / NCC with involvement of community during the last five years 3.4.3.1. Number of extension and outreach Programs conducted in collaboration with industry, community, and Non- Government Organizations through NSS/ NCC etc., year wise during the last five years VIEW
3.5.1 Number of functional MoUs/linkages with institutions / industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the last five years VIEW

Criteria 4 : Infrastructure and Learning Resources

Metric No. Parameter Link
4.1.2 Percentage of expenditure for infrastructure development and augmentation excluding salary during the last five years 4.1.2.1. Expenditure for infrastructure development and augmentation, excluding salary year wise during last five years (INR in lakhs) VIEW
4.3.2 Student – Computer ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) 4.3.2.1. Number of computers available for students usage during the latest completed academic year: VIEW
4.4.1 Percentage expenditure incurred on maintenance of physical facilities and academic support facilities excluding salary component, during the last five years 4.4.1.1. Expenditure incurred on maintenance of infrastructure (physical facilities and academic support facilities) excluding salary component year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs) VIEW
Criteria 5 : Student Support and Progression
Metric No. Parameter Link
5.1.1 Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the institution, government and non-government bodies, industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years 5.1.1.1. Number of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the institution, Government and non-government bodies, industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years VIEW
5.1.2 Following capacity development and skills enhancement activities are organised for improving students’ capability 1. Soft skills 2. Language and communication skills 3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene) 4. ICT / computing skills VIEW
5.1.3 Percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counseling offered by the Institution during the last five years 5.1.3.1. Number of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counselling offered by the institution year wise during last five years VIEW
5.1.4 The institution adopts the following for redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases 1. Implementation of guidelines of statutory / regulatory bodies 2. Organisation wide awareness and undertakings on policies with zero tolerance 3. Mechanisms for submission of online/offline students’ grievances 4. Timely redressal of the grievances through appropriate committees VIEW
5.2.1 Percentage of placement of outgoing students and students progressing to higher education during the last five years 5.2.1.1. Number of outgoing students placed and / or progressed to higher education year wise during the last five years 5.2.1.2. Number of outgoing students year wise during the last five years VIEW
5.2.2 Percentage of students qualifying in state / national / international level examinations during the last five years 5.2.2.1. Number of students qualifying in state/ national/ international level examinations year wise during last five years (eg: IIT/JAM/NET/SLET/GATE/GMAT/GPAT/CLAT/CAT/ GRE/TOEFL/ IELTS/Civil Services/State government examinations etc.) VIEW
5.3.1 Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports / cultural activities at University / state / national / international level (award for a team event should be counted as one) during the last five years 5.3.1.1. Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/cultural activities at national/international level (award for a team event should be counted as one) year wise during the last five years VIEW
5.3.2 Average number of sports and cultural programs in which students of the Institution participated during last five years (organised by the institution / other institutions) 5.3.2.1. Number of sports and cultural programs in which students of the Institution participated year wise during last five years VIEW

Criteria 6 : Governance, Leadership and Management

Metric No. Parameter Link
6.2.2 Institution implements e-governance in its operations 1. Administration 2. Finance and Accounts 3. Student Admission and Support 4. Examination VIEW
6.3.2 Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences / workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years 6.3.2.1. Number of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies year wise during the last five years VIEW
6.3.3 Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), Management Development Programmes (MDPs) professional development / administrative training programs during the last five years 6.3.3.1. Total number of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), Management Development Programmes (MDPs) professional development /administrative training programs during the last five years 6.3.3.2. Number of non-teaching staff year wise during the last five years VIEW
6.5.2 Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include: 1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); quality improvement initiatives identified and implemented 2. Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA) and follow-up action taken 3. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s) 4. Participation in NIRF and other recognized rankings 5. Any other quality audit/accreditation recognized by state, national or international agencies such as NAAC, NBA etc. VIEW

Criteria 7 : Institutional Values and Best Practices

Metric No. Parameter Link
Criteria 7 : Institutional Values and Best Practices Criteria 7 : Institutional Values and Best Practices Criteria 7 : Institutional Values and Best Practices
Criteria 7 : Institutional Values and Best Practices Criteria 7 : Institutional Values and Best Practices Criteria 7 : Institutional Values and Best Practices

Best Practices

Institutional Distinctiveness

Code of Conduct

All students at Sri Ramakrishna College of Engineering are required to uphold a stringent level of discipline while within the college premises.

General code of Conduct

  • The general rule at Sri Ramakrishna College of Engineering mandates that all individuals maintain a notably high level of discipline within the campus grounds.
  • Students are expected to maintain the cleanliness of the college campus and show respect towards elders while adhering to principles of gender equality.
  • Any form of ragging is strictly prohibited and punishable.
  • Punctuality, regularity, and attentiveness in classes are emphasized, with students required to be seated in lecture halls five minutes before class begins.
  • Perfect order and silence are to be maintained in lecture halls, laboratories, seminar halls, exam halls, and workshops.
  • Attendance of at least 75% is necessary to be eligible for Anna University Exams.
  • Leaving the campus during working hours requires prior permission from the Head of Department.
  • Permission from counselors, year in-charges, and HOD is necessary for taking leave.
  • Medical certificates are required for absences exceeding three days due to illness.
  • Leaving during internal assessment tests or examinations is strictly prohibited.
  • Absence from internal assessment tests, model practical examinations, and model theory examinations is closely monitored.
  • Malpractices during examinations are taken seriously.
  • Roaming outside the classroom during lecture hours is not allowed.
  • Students are advised to wear decent formal attire and adhere to specified uniforms for laboratory/workshop classes, including shoes.
  • Damaging college property and scribbling on walls, tables, and boards are strictly forbidden.
  • Usage of mobile phones is prohibited inside the classroom.

Conduct in the Department

  • The Head of Department (HOD) will assign teaching loads to faculty members based on their expertise.
  • Once a subject is allocated, the faculty member is responsible for preparing the lecture along with a lesson plan.
  • The lesson plan and course file must be approved by the HOD or Vice-Principal and should include a preface, timetable, previous year university question papers, notes, handouts, OHP sheets, test/exam question papers, and three model answer scripts for each test/exam, along with any assignments.
  • Faculty members must regularly update and maintain their logbooks for inspection by the HOD or Vice-Principal.
  • Before the start of the semester, lecture notes must be submitted to the HOD and Vice-Principal.
  • Additionally, faculty members are expected to undertake additional responsibilities as assigned by the HOD/Principal in academic, co-curricular, or extra-curricular activities.
  • Each faculty member is responsible for maintaining student attendance records, noting absentees roll numbers daily in the Master Attendance Register of the department after classes/laboratory hours.
  • Prior approval for leave is required from the faculty member, with proper alternate arrangements made for class/lab/invigilation.
  • In emergencies, the HOD or the next senior faculty member must be informed, with appropriate alternate arrangements suggested.

Laboratory

  • Faculty members are required to be present inside the lab 15 minutes prior to the start of lab classes.
  • The faculty member conducting the practical session must personally perform the experiments and ensure satisfactory results before instructing students to proceed.
  • Whenever feasible, additional experiments should be provided to clarify concepts for students.
  • Lab observations and records must be corrected promptly during the next class session.
  • Lab classes should adhere to the following structure: 30 minutes for observation, 90 minutes for conducting experiments, and 30 minutes for result verification and viva.
  • Faculty members are responsible for updating the lab manual in accordance with the revised syllabus. Sample records must be maintained in every lab.

Student Faculty Relation

  • The faculty member is expected to maintain good control over students in the classroom.
  • Upon entering the class, attendance should be taken immediately.
  • Latecomers may be permitted to attend but marked absent.
  • For repeat offenders or habitual latecomers, the teacher should attempt personal counseling first.
  • If no change is observed, the student should be directed to meet the class coordinator or HOD.
  • Faculty members should handle insubordination with tact.
  • While its important to be strict, harsh language that may hurt students feelings should never be used.

HR Policy

Capacity Building and Skill Enhancement

Stakeholders Feedback

  • Students’ Feedback
  • Alumni Feedback
  • Teachers Feedback
  • Employers Feedback
  • Stakeholders Feedback Analysis Report
  • Action Taken Report
  • Questionnaire
  • University Communication

Annual Report